http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/27/us/oregon-standoffmmon-bundy-acquittal/ind...

October 28 2016, June 26, August 22 Dates for Bundy 'trials'
https://www.bing.com/search?q=bundy+aquitted&form=EDGTCT&qs=PF&cvid=7a9c...

An evangelical pastor claims he met with a senior Republican Congressman who told him of a plot to “remove Trump suddenly from office”.

During an appearance on Revival Ministries International, Rodney Howard-Browne said he spent three hours “from 9:30 in the evening until 12:30am with one of the senior ranking members of Congress”.

http://usdefensewatch.com/2017/07/plan-to-violently-overthrow-trump-leak...

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2017/07/u-s-attorney-overs...

Why does the President not arrest those in Congress currently committing treason? Whose going to do the arrest? Read further in this post.

"Where are the US Marshals?" 
A Mockery has been made of the US Marshalls, is one answer to where are the US Marshalls. If the ones that that have appointed themselves or their relatives are the ones you are counting on please find out a whole lot more about the US Marshalls. Look for the relatives of the 'so called' judges who were never elected and in my opinion should be in proison being the 'Marshalls.' So if they are BAR Assocation attorneys on top of that they are mandated by the United Nations to do what the United Nations orders.
"Where is the FBI?"
Once again keep in mind the Treay of 1947 dictating that ALL BAR Association members must adhere to what the UN tells them to do! See my post located:
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=157670
Supreme Court decision 14-1305)
“Generally, a plaintiff’s allegations of jurisdiction are sufficient, but when they are questioned, as in this case, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove jurisdiction. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 1936, 298 U.S. 178, 56 S.Ct. 780, 80 L.Ed. 1135; Welsh v. American Surety Co., 5 Cir. 1951, 186 F.2d 16; 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, supra Sec. 1363 at 653. . . .” Rosemound Sand and Gravel Co. v. Lambert Sand and Gravel Co., 469 F.2d 416 (1972).
Being a member of the BAR Association is alliance if not outright FRAUD on the De Jure Courts and the People. Whether BAR calls itself the British Accredited Registry, the BAR has through the Treaty of 1947 made all American BAR association members foreign agents. And under: Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 you must declare yourself as foreign agent.
18 U.S.C. § 219 is not a registration statute, but is a conflict of interest statute which makes it a criminal offense for a "public official" of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branches to be or to act as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under FARA. 
Furthermore due to the Court decision U.S. Supreme Court 14:1305 decision: you must present DeJure Credentials to proceed in any manner.

Since all members of the American BAR Association are under the Treaty of 1947 putting the ABA under the United Nationa. It has been found that the ABA members including Judges are foreign agents and are requited to notify parties interacted with. Which means every person going into a court room or dealing with an ABA member, should be notified ra\Judge and any BAR Association member is a foreign Agent.

IF this is not Treason WHAT IS? First look the Constitution for the Treason definition, then if you need more about the BAR Association  1947 Treaty with the UN the Statutes here: Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 you must declare yourself as foreign agent.
18 U.S.C. § 219 is not a registration statute, but is a conflict of interest statute which makes it a criminal offense for a "public official" of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branches to be or to act as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under FARA. 

When Congress goes on vacation - - -
Why not have the sheriffs do the arresting of their 'representatives' and start enforcing the Supreme Court Decision 14-1305 (see below) or should the ones refusing to obey the LAW be charged with accessory to their 'representatives' crimes?  Sheriffs if you need the statutes see below.

katsung47 posted:
" An evangelical pastor claims he met with a senior Republican Congressman who told him of a plot to “remove Trump suddenly from office”.

During an appearance on Revival Ministries International, Rodney Howard-Browne said he spent three hours “from 9:30 in the evening until 12:30am with one of the senior ranking members of Congress”.

http://usdefensewatch.com/2017/07/plan-to-violently-overthrow-trump-leak... "

Further information you need.

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2017/07/u-s-attorney-overs...

Why does the President not arrest those in Congress currently committing treason? Whose going to do the arrest? Read further in this post.

"Where are the US Marshals?" 
A Mockery has been made of the US Marshalls, is one answer to where are the US Marshalls. If the ones that that have appointed themselves or their relatives are the ones you are counting on please find out a whole lot more about the US Marshalls. Look for the relatives of the 'so called' judges who were never elected and in my opinion should be in prison being the 'Marshalls.' So if they are BAR Association attorneys on top of that they are mandated by the United Nations to do what the United Nations orders.
"Where is the FBI?"
Once again keep in mind the Treaty of 1947 dictating that ALL BAR Association members must adhere to what the UN tells them to do! See my post located:
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=157670

Supreme Court decision 14-1305)
“Generally, a plaintiff’s allegations of jurisdiction are sufficient, but when they are questioned, as in this case, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove jurisdiction. 

How can courts with totally lacking credentialed Foreign Agent 'judges, Prosecutors etc. have any jurisdiction? When they themselves are perpetuating fraud upon the Court system by means of the BAR Association UN Treaty of 1947?

Being a member of the BAR Association is alliance if not outright FRAUD on the De Jure Courts and the People. Whether BAR calls itself the British Accredited Registry, the BAR has through the Treaty of 1947 made all American BAR association members foreign agents. And under: Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 you must declare yourself as foreign agent.
18 U.S.C. § 219 is not a registration statute, but is a conflict of interest statute which makes it a criminal offense for a "public official" of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branches to be or to act as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under FARA. 
Furthermore due to the Court decision U.S. Supreme Court 14:1305 decision: you must present De Jure Credentials to proceed in any manner.

Since all members of the American BAR Association are under the Treaty of 1947 putting the ABA under the United Nations. It has been found that the ABA members including Judges, are foreign agents and are required to notify parties interacted with. Which means every person going into a court room or dealing with an ABA member, should be notified which includes Judges and any BAR Association member due to being a foreign Agent.
 
KEEP IN MIND that the 7th Amendment COMMON LAW is the answer to replacing the current 'Foreign Agents' who have been coopting the DOJ and Court Systems.

Patricia JHS
Direct Heir of the House of Stuart

ads.
scantv77 
EXTREMELY important !!! 
Sun Jul 30, 2017 08:42 
72.173.221.44
As of tomorrow there will be a court case 'Tennessee vs Heather Tucci' which should be of huge importance to everyone wanting to take back our Justice System. But the powers that be do not even want you to know about it let alone be there tomorrow in DC. Heather needs our backing. Those of you who can be in DC by tomorrows hearing on the 7/31/17 must make every effort to back up Heather Tucci!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1783)

http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-citizen-journalism/2017/07/utilizing-y...

Treason! Hillary and Mueller Both Sold Uranium to Putin
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2017/07/treason-hillary-and...

Robert Mueller’s Role in Clinton Scheme to Sell 20 Percent of US Uranium to Russia
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Robert_Mueller%E2%80%99s_Role_in_Clinton_...

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=157906;ti...
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2348.htm

Charter
The Congress of the Confederation will "earnestly recommend" to state legislatures to recognize the rightful owners of all confiscated lands and "provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects" (Loyalists);
1.      Britain acknowledges the United States (namely the thirteen states, listed1.    [14]) to be free, sovereign, and independent states, and that the 1.    British Crown and all heirs and successors relinquish claims to the Government, property, and territorial rights of the same, and every part thereof;
2.      Establishing the boundaries of the United States, including but not limited to those between the United States and 2.   British North America;
3.      Granting fishing rights to United States fishermen in the 3.    Grand Banks, off the coast of 3.        Newfoundland and in the 3.      Gulf of Saint Lawrence;
4.      Recognizing the lawful contracted debts to be paid to creditors on either side;
5.      The 5.  Congress of the Confederation will "earnestly recommend" to state legislatures to recognize the rightful owners of all confiscated lands and "provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects" (5.   Loyalists);
6.      United States will prevent future confiscations of the property of Loyalists;
Prisoners of war on both sides are to be released; all property of the British army (including slaves) now in the United States is to remain and be forfeited;
8.      Great Britain and the United States are each to be given perpetual access to the 8.     Mississippi River;
9.      Territories captured by Americans subsequent to the treaty will be returned without compensation;
10.     Ratification of the treaty is to occur within six months from its signing.
Eschatocol. "Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three."
Representing the United States were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Henry Laurens, and John Adams. David Hartley and Richard Oswald represented Great Britain. The treaty was signed at the Hotel d'York (presently 56 Rue Jacob) in Paris on September 3, 1783, by Adams, Franklin, Jay, and Hartley.[6]
— France, Spain, and the Dutch Republic — are known collectively as the Peace of Paris.[3][

Sarbanes Oxley Act - Sarbanse Oxley and Federal Notary for bill of lading overriding US.Congress - http://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=Sarbanse+Oxley+and+Federal+Notary+for+bill+of+lading+overriding+US.Congress&oq=Sarbanse+Oxley+and+Federal+Notary+for+bill+of+lading+overriding+US.Congress